APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING LAW IN THE WORKS OF UKRAINIAN DIASPORA REPRESENTATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2022/4.123-2Keywords:
law, S. S. Dnistryanskyi, F. V. Taranovskyi, M. M. Kovalevskyi, O. O. Eichelman, K. A. LevitskyiAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze scientific approaches to legal understanding by representatives of the Ukrainian diaspora in different countries of the world. The research identified the most famous Ukrainian lawyers-theoreticians, clarified which positions prevail among them and which characteristic features are inherent in their types of law understanding. In the article the author used a number of general philosophical, general scientific and specifically scientific methods. The use of the dialectical method made it possible to fully and comprehensively reveal the approaches of scientists to understanding law. With the help of historical-comparative method, the ideas of scientists were compared with other scientists in order to highlight certain features in their views on law. The method of analysis and synthesis was manifested in the processing of primary sources, scientific articles and archival materials. In the article the views on the law understanding of the well-known law scientist in the field of theory, philosophy and constitutional law S.S. Dnistryanskyi are revealed. His views on law were dominated by the sociological approach and the ideas of natural law. The peculiarity of the scientific views of F.V. Taranovsky is the combination of positions on the recognition of positive law and its interaction with actual customary law, the nation law, society law, which, although unofficially, but nevertheless plays an important role in the regulation of social relations. M.M. Kovalevskyi considered law as a product of the historical development of society and advocated the idea of close dependence between existing law and one or another economic, political, and religious-ethical system of life. O.O. Eichelman recognized positivism in law, but assumed that the existence of this socially important category was determined not by the will of the state, but by the direct efforts of the nation to self-organize and establish order. Also, the author believed that the emergence of law and its establishment by the state must necessarily be carried out at the expense of control by the relevant social institutions. K.A. Levitskyi's scientific views were positivistic and social in nature. He believed that law arises from the state, its authorities, which, in turn, are elected by the people. Elements of the sociological and positivist approach and ideas of natural law are traced in the views of these scientists.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
