THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION IN THE REGULATION OF LABOUR RELATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2026/1.131-17Keywords:
International Labour Organization, international labour standards, international labour law, tripartism, global labour governance, institutional inertia, platform economy.Abstract
Background. This article examines the transformation of the International Labour Organization's role within the system of international labour regulation and identifies the key challenges the Organization faces in the 21st century. The relevance of the study stems from profound changes in the global labour market, including the expansion of the digital economy, the emergence of new forms of employment, and the increasing influence of regional and non-state regulatory actors. These developments significantly affect the International Labour Organization's ability to effectively fulfil its normative mandate.
Methods. The research applies systemic, institutional, formal-legal, and comparative-legal methods. The systemic and institutional approaches are used to analyse the evolution of the International Labour Organization and the transformation of its organizational model; the formal-legal method enables the examination of international labour standards and mechanisms for their implementation; and the comparative-legal method allows the comparison of the International Labour Organization's activities with regional and alternative regulatory initiatives. The study also employs the concepts of the principal–agent problem and bureaucratic inertia.
Results. The article demonstrates that while throughout the 20th century the International Labour Organization primarily fulfilled a norm-setting function, in the 21st century its activities have acquired a more complex nature, combining normative and operational tools. It is shown that the expansion of programmatic activities is accompanied by the growth of the administrative apparatus, the strengthening of institutional inertia, and a slowdown in the adoption of new international labour standards. The analysis reveals internal limitations of organizational effectiveness, such as bureaucratization, as well as external challenges stemming from digitalization, the rise of the platform economy, and the growing influence of regional actors, particularly the European Union.
Conclusions. It is concluded that although the International Labour Organization remains a key actor in the field of international labour law, its future effectiveness depends on overcoming institutional inertia and adapting to the evolving conditions of global governance. The article substantiates the need for comprehensive reform of the International Labour Organization's organizational model aimed at restoring the balance between managerial and expert-normative functions, strengthening analytical capacity, and developing flexible mechanisms of interaction with alternative regulators.
References
Alston, P. (2004). Facing up to the complexities of the ILO's core labour standards agenda. European Journal of International Law, 15, 467–521.
Boockmann, B. (2000). The ratification of ILO conventions: A failure time analysis. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24360/1/dp0014.pdf
Charnovitz, S. (2000). The International Labour Organization in its second century. Geneva: ILO.
Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on improving working conditions in platform work. (2024). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2831/oj/eng
European Parliamentary Research Service. (2019). EU and ILO: Shaping the future of work. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU%282019%29638407
European Parliamentary Research Service. (2022). Labour rights in EU trade agreements. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698800/EPRS_BRI%282022%29698800_EN.pdf
International Labour Organization. (2024). Composition and structure of the staff at 31 December 2024. https://www.ilo.org/resource/conference-paper/gb/353/composition-and-structure-staff-31-december-2024
International Labour Organization. (2026). Decent work in the platform economy. International Labour Conference, 114th Session. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/WCMS_716766/lang--en/index.html
International Labour Organization. (2026). NORMLEX Information System on International Labour Standards. https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12000:0
ILO chief ready to face up to duty of reform and rigour. (2025). SwissInfo. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/international-geneva/ilo-chief-ready-to-face-up-to-duty-of-reform-and-rigour/89447535
Jakovleski, V., Jerbi, S., & Biersteker, T. (2019). The ILO's role in global governance: Limits and potential. International Development Policy, 11, 82–108. https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/3026
Maupain, F. (2013). The future of the International Labour Organization in the global economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57, 241–276.
Peter, L. J., & Hull, R. (1969). The Peter principle. New York: William Morrow.
Vaubel, R. (2006). Principal–agent problems in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 1, 125–138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225696741_Principal-Agent_Problems_in_International_Organizations
Venediktov, S. V. (2025a). International and comparative labour law [in Ukrainian].
Venediktov, S. V. (2025b). The employee's right to promotion under national labour legislation [in Ukrainian].
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Олександр ХАРКЕВИЧ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
