THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION IN THE REGULATION OF LABOUR RELATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Authors

  • Oleksandr KHARKEVYCH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2026/1.131-17

Keywords:

International Labour Organization, international labour standards, international labour law, tripartism, global labour governance, institutional inertia, platform economy.

Abstract

Background. This article examines the transformation of the International Labour Organization's role within the system of international labour regulation and identifies the key challenges the Organization faces in the 21st century. The relevance of the study stems from profound changes in the global labour market, including the expansion of the digital economy, the emergence of new forms of employment, and the increasing influence of regional and non-state regulatory actors. These developments significantly affect the International Labour Organization's ability to effectively fulfil its normative mandate.

Methods. The research applies systemic, institutional, formal-legal, and comparative-legal methods. The systemic and institutional approaches are used to analyse the evolution of the International Labour Organization and the transformation of its organizational model; the formal-legal method enables the examination of international labour standards and mechanisms for their implementation; and the comparative-legal method allows the comparison of the International Labour Organization's activities with regional and alternative regulatory initiatives. The study also employs the concepts of the principal–agent problem and bureaucratic inertia.

Results. The article demonstrates that while throughout the 20th century the International Labour Organization primarily fulfilled a norm-setting function, in the 21st century its activities have acquired a more complex nature, combining normative and operational tools. It is shown that the expansion of programmatic activities is accompanied by the growth of the administrative apparatus, the strengthening of institutional inertia, and a slowdown in the adoption of new international labour standards. The analysis reveals internal limitations of organizational effectiveness, such as bureaucratization, as well as external challenges stemming from digitalization, the rise of the platform economy, and the growing influence of regional actors, particularly the European Union.

Conclusions. It is concluded that although the International Labour Organization remains a key actor in the field of international labour law, its future effectiveness depends on overcoming institutional inertia and adapting to the evolving conditions of global governance. The article substantiates the need for comprehensive reform of the International Labour Organization's organizational model aimed at restoring the balance between managerial and expert-normative functions, strengthening analytical capacity, and developing flexible mechanisms of interaction with alternative regulators.

References

Alston, P. (2004). Facing up to the complexities of the ILO's core labour standards agenda. European Journal of International Law, 15, 467–521.

Boockmann, B. (2000). The ratification of ILO conventions: A failure time analysis. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24360/1/dp0014.pdf

Charnovitz, S. (2000). The International Labour Organization in its second century. Geneva: ILO.

Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on improving working conditions in platform work. (2024). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2831/oj/eng

European Parliamentary Research Service. (2019). EU and ILO: Shaping the future of work. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU%282019%29638407

European Parliamentary Research Service. (2022). Labour rights in EU trade agreements. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698800/EPRS_BRI%282022%29698800_EN.pdf

International Labour Organization. (2024). Composition and structure of the staff at 31 December 2024. https://www.ilo.org/resource/conference-paper/gb/353/composition-and-structure-staff-31-december-2024

International Labour Organization. (2026). Decent work in the platform economy. International Labour Conference, 114th Session. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/WCMS_716766/lang--en/index.html

International Labour Organization. (2026). NORMLEX Information System on International Labour Standards. https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12000:0

ILO chief ready to face up to duty of reform and rigour. (2025). SwissInfo. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/international-geneva/ilo-chief-ready-to-face-up-to-duty-of-reform-and-rigour/89447535

Jakovleski, V., Jerbi, S., & Biersteker, T. (2019). The ILO's role in global governance: Limits and potential. International Development Policy, 11, 82–108. https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/3026

Maupain, F. (2013). The future of the International Labour Organization in the global economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57, 241–276.

Peter, L. J., & Hull, R. (1969). The Peter principle. New York: William Morrow.

Vaubel, R. (2006). Principal–agent problems in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 1, 125–138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225696741_Principal-Agent_Problems_in_International_Organizations

Venediktov, S. V. (2025a). International and comparative labour law [in Ukrainian].

Venediktov, S. V. (2025b). The employee's right to promotion under national labour legislation [in Ukrainian].

Additional Files

Published

20.07.2026

How to Cite

THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION IN THE REGULATION OF LABOUR RELATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY. (2026). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 131(1). https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2026/1.131-17