PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO GENOCIDE: FEATURES OF THE NORMATIVE CONSTRUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-13Keywords:
genocide, public calls for genocide, production of materials with calls for genocide, crimes against peace, crimes against humanityAbstract
Background. The purpose of the article is to investigate the objective and subjective characteristics of public calls for genocide as a criminal offense (crime) provided for in Part 2 of Art. 442 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and in international criminal law.
Methods. To achieve the set goal and defined tasks, the logical-normative method and the system analysis method formed the basis of the research.
Results. The article highlights the problem of the ratio of normative compositions of public calls to genocide in the criminal legislation of Ukraine and in international criminal law.
Сonclusion. The conclusion was drawn that the existence of national, ethnic, racial and religious groups, as a social value, is the object of criminal protection of public calls for genocide, and, accordingly, the direct object of this crime. It was concluded that public calls for genocide can be made in different forms and by means of any means of information transmission, the main feature of such a call is publicity, that is, expressed before or given to an indefinite number of persons, and not to a set of individualized persons. The conclusion was formulated that, unlike the criminal legislation of Ukraine, in accordance with Art. 3 of the Convention criminalizes not just public calls for genocide, but direct and public calls for genocide. Therefore, in international criminal law, calls for genocide are "not limited" to publicity, but they (calls) must be direct.
It has also been investigated that the distribution of material calling for genocide consists in bringing its content to the knowledge of an unspecified number of persons and can exist in various forms (including paper, digital, globally available multi-platform encrypted freemium cloud messengers, on film or any other media built on the technology of recording, processing, transmission, storage and reproduction of textual, visual or audiovisual material) and spread in different ways depending, first of all, on the form of their "existence".
Forms of actions regulated in Part 2 of Art. 442 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, are broader than in international criminal law and do not exclude each other, and in a relevant life situation, the subject can commit two or three acts at once within the limits of one actual criminal offense (crime).
The subject of public calls for genocide can be not only a public or well-known person (for example, so-called "opinion makers" or "media faces"), but in general, any person who meets (possess) the characteristics necessary and sufficient for its recognition as the subject of a crime in accordance with criminal legislation.
In the national criminal legislation of Ukraine, the presence of the purpose of further committing genocide in the case of public appeals and distribution of materials is not a mandatory element of the composition of the criminal offense provided for in part 2 of Article 442 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; in international criminal law and the practice of its application, a different approach has been developed: a special goal – the further commission of genocide – is a mandatory characteristic of direct and public calls for genocide.
References
Список використаних джерел
Christian J. Tams, Lars Berster and Bjo¨rn Schiffbauer (2014). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: A Commentary.
Prosecutor v Akayesu (Judgement) ICTR-96-4-T (2 September 1998), Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, 51 U.N. ORGA Supp. (No. 10), at 26, U.N. Doc. A/51/10(1996).
Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, (1998) 51 U.N. ORGA Supp. (No. 10), at 26, U.N. Doc. A/51/10(1996).
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Media case) (Judgement and sentence) ICTR-99-52-T (3 December 2003).
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Media case) (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-99-52-A (28 November 2007).
Prosecutor v Kalimanzira (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-05-88-A (20 October 2010)/ Niyitegeka Trial Judgement, paras.
Prosecutor v Bikindi (Judgement) ICTR-01-72-T (2 December 2008).
References
Christian J. Tams, Lars Berster and Bjo¨rn Schiffbauer (2014). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: A Commentary.
Prosecutor v Akayesu (Judgement) ICTR-96-4-T (2 September 1998), Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, 51 U.N. ORGA Supp. (No. 10), at 26, U.N. Doc. A/51/10(1996).
Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, (1998) 51 U.N. ORGA Supp. (No. 10), at 26, U.N. Doc. A/51/10(1996).
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Media case) (Judgement and sentence) ICTR-99-52-T (3 December 2003).
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Media case) (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-99-52-A (28 November 2007).
Prosecutor v Kalimanzira (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-05-88-A (20 October 2010)/ Niyitegeka Trial Judgement, paras.
Prosecutor v Bikindi (Judgement) ICTR-01-72-T (2 December 2008)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
