CONTRACT IN FAVOUR OF A THIRD PARTY

Authors

  • Serhii Vavzhenchuk КНУ імені Тараса Шевченка

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5

Keywords:

contract, contract law, contract in favour of a third party, classification of contracts, types of contracts

Abstract

The article, based on scientific doctrine, the legislation of Ukraine and some other countries, examines certain issues related to the problems
of legal regulation of a contract in a favour of a third party. A review of the main scientific papers of Ukrainian scientists, who studied the contract
in favour of a third party and contractual legal relations arising from the contract in favour of a third party, was carried out. Among scientists, the
issue of scientific theory of the moment when third party's right emerges under a contract in favour of a third party remains unresolved. That is
the reason the article, on a methodological level, draws specific attention to the main theories of emergence of a third party's right under a
contract in favour of a third party. In view of the comprehensive analysis of the norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine, attention is drawn to what
theory of the moment of conclusion of a contract in favour of a third party was adopted by the legislator in the Civil Code of Ukraine. In the
context of analysis of a contract in favour of third parties, attention is paid to English law, namely the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
It is clarified whether in English contract law, before the adoption of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act, according to precedent law, the
rule called "privity of contract rule" was still applied. It is also emphasized that a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from
a contract of assignment of creditor's right to a third party (singular succession). In the case of singular succession, the previous creditor is
'removed' from the obligation, and in a contract in favour of a third party, such a replacement of the creditor in the obligation does not occur,
since the creditor and the third party do not replace each other in the existing obligation, they are not successors of each other and as participants
of the contractual relationship exist at the same time without excluding each other. Also, a contract in favour of a third party should be
distinguished from a contract under which fulfilment is to be performed to a third person.

References

Список використаних джерел

Кот О. О. Перехід прав кредитора до третіх осіб у цивільному праві України : автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. 12.00.03 / Кот Олексій Олександрович ; Київ. нац. ун-т імені Т. Шевченка. – Київ, 2002. – 20 с.

Кот О. О. Перехід прав кредиторів. Історія. Теорія. Законодавство / О. О. Кот. – Київ : Юрінком Інтер, 2002. – 160 с.

Бровченко І. О. Участь третіх осіб у цивільно-правових зобов'язаннях : автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.03 / Бровченко Ігор Олександрович ; Нац. юрид. акад. України ім. Ярослава Мудрого. – Харків, 2009. – 20 с.

Кузьмич О. Я. Договір на користь третьої особи в цивільному праві України : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.03 / Кузьмич Олег Ярославович. – Київ, 2010. – 212 с.

Кузьмич О. Я. Договори на користь третіх осіб у цивільному праві України : монографія / О. Я. Кузьмич. – Івано-Франківськ : Вид-во Прикарпат. нац. ун-ту ім. В. Стефаника, 2014. – 334 с.

Свиридюк С. М. Виникнення прав третьої особи, на користь якої укладено договір / С. М. Свиридюк, Л. В. Герасимчук [Електронний ресурс] // Науковий огляд. – 2017. – № 10. Режим доступу: https://www.naukajournal.org/index.php/naukajournal/article/view/1355/1457 (дата звернення: 06.02.2023).

Вавженчук С. Я. Договірне право: навч. посіб. / С. Я. Вавженчук ; Київ. нац. екон. ун-т ім. Вадима Гетьмана. – Київ: КНЕУ, 2011. - 584 с.

Вавженчук С. Я. Договірне право: підручник: у 2 т. / С. Я. Вавженчук. – Харків: Право, 2022. – Т. І. – 632 с.

Tweddle v. Atkinson [1861] EWHC QB J57, 121 ER 762 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/1861/J57.html (дата звернення: 06.02.2023).

Downes T. A. Textbook on contract / T. A. Downes. – 5th rev. ed. – London :Blackstone Press Ltd., 1997. – 446 p.

Синайский В. И. Русское гражданское право. Выпуск II. Обязательственное, семейное и наследственное право / В. И. Синайский. – 1915. – 451 с.

Zweigert K. An Introduction to Comparative Law / K. Zweigert, H. Kötz / trans. by T. Weir. – 3rd ed. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1998. – 744 p.

Privity of Contract: The Impact of the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 / ed. by R. Merkin. – Informa Law from Routledge, 2000. – 552 p.

Markesinis B. S. TortLaw/ B. S. Markesinis, S. F. Deakin. – 4th ed. – Oxford : Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press, 1999. – 816 p.

Иоффе О. С. Обязательственное право / О. С. Иоффе. – Москва : Юрид. лит., 1975. – 880 c.

Дубовицкій Ю. Договоры въ пользу третьихъ лицъ / Ю. Дубовицкій // Журналъ министерства юстиціи. – 1910. – № 10. – С. 241–310.

References

Kot, O. O. (2002). Perekhid prav kredytora do tretikh osib v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy [Transfer of the creditor's rights to third parties in the civil law of Ukraine] [PhD Dissertation Abstract] (in Ukrainian).

Kot, O. O. (2002). Perekhid prav kredytoriv: Istoriia. Teoriia. Zakonodavstvo [Transfer of creditors' rights: History. Theory. Legislation]. YurinkomInter (in Ukrainian).

Brovchenko, I. O. (2009). Uchast tretikh osib u tsyvilno-pravovykh zobov'iazanniakh [Participation of third parties in civil obligations] [PhD Dissertation] (in Ukrainian).

Kuzmych, O. Ya. (2010). Dohovir na koryst tretoï osoby v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukraïny [Contract in favour of a third party in the civil law of Ukraine] [PhD Dissertation] (in Ukrainian).

Kuzmych, O. Ya. (2014). Dohovory na koryst tretikh osib u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukraïny [Contracts in favour of a third parties in the civil law of Ukraine]. Vyd-vo Prykarpat. nats. un-tuim. V. Stefanyka (in Ukrainian).

Svyrydiuk, S. M. & Herasymchuk, L. V. (2017). Vynyknennia prav tretoi osoby, na koryst yakoi ukladeno dohovir [Emergence of the rights of the third party in whose favour the contract was concluded]. Naukovyi Ohliad [Scientific Review], 10. https://www.naukajournal.org/index.php/naukajournal/article/view/1355/1457 (in Ukrainian).

Vavzhenchuk, S. Ya. (2011). Dohovirne pravo : navch. posib [Contract Law: educational manual]. KNEU (in Ukrainian).

Vavzhenchuk, S. Ya. (2022). Dohovir ne pravo : pidruchnyk [Contract Law: textbook] (Vol. 1). Pravo (in Ukrainian).

Tweddle v. Atkinson (High Court of Justice Queen's Bench DivisionJune 7, 1861).

Downes, T. A. (1997). Textbook on Contract (5th ed.). Blackstone Press Ltd.

Sinayskiy, V. I. (1915). Russkoye grazhdanskoye pravo. Vypusk II. Obyazatelstvennoye. semeynoye i nasledstvennoye pravo [Russian Сivil Law. Issue II. Obligations, Family and Inheritance Law] (in Russian).

Zweigert, K., &Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed.). ClarendonPress.

Merkin, R. (Ed.). (2000). Privity of Contract: The Impact of the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 (1st ed.). In forma Law from Routledge.

Markesinis, B. S., & Deakin, S. F. (1999). Tort Law (4th ed.). Clarendon Press; Oxford UniversityPress.

Ioffe, O. S. (1975). Obyazatelstvennoye pravo [Obligations Law]. Yurid. Lit. (in Russian).

Dubovitskіi, Y. (1910). Dogovory v polzutretikhlits. Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsіi [Contracts in favour of third parties]. Zhurnal Ministerstva Yustitsіi [Journal of the Ministry of Justice], 10, 241–310 (in Russian).

Published

06.08.2023

Issue

Section

Types of publication

How to Cite

CONTRACT IN FAVOUR OF A THIRD PARTY. (2023). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 125(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5

Most read articles by the same author(s)