COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT (CONTRACT): GENESIS AND CURRENT STATE OF UNDERSTANDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2025/1.129-2Keywords:
contract, agreement, collective contract, collective agreement, labour relations, social partnership, protection of rights, social dialogueAbstract
Background. The article is devoted to the genesis and modern understanding of the collective agreement and the collective contract. This issue gained considerable relevance due to the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On Collective Agreements and Contracts". The quality and vector of practice in this regard will depend on how participants of legal relations in the field of labour and courts understand the legal nature of the collective agreement and collective contract.
Methods. The article is based on the following general and special scientific and legal cognition methods: historical, formal logic methods, and legal comparative methods. The historical method was used to study the genesis of the collective agreement and the collective contract. The formal logic methods were manifested in clarifying gaps in the legal regulation of the collective agreement and the collective contract. With the help of the legal comparative method, it was possible to compare the approaches to understanding the collective agreement and the collective contract.
Results. The genesis of the concept and the legal nature of a collective agreement and a collective contract are considered through the prism of comparative research taking into account the doctrine and the new Law of Ukraine "On Collective Agreements and Contracts". Doctrinal and normative approaches to understanding the concept of collective agreement and collective contract are analyzed.
Conclusions. By outlining scientific approaches in legal literature, two main approaches are distinguished in understanding the concept of a collective agreement: 1) The first approach reflects a monistic concept: the concept of a collective agreement as a local normative act; 2) the pluralistic concept: the concept of the dual legal nature of the collective agreement. The given concept outlines the idea that the collective agreement acts as both a local normative act and reflects the obligatory nature of the collective agreement. The collective agreement (collective contract) should be considered as a heterogeneous legal substance, that is, through the prism of complex multi-level collaboration: (1) of the legal concept of an agreement (consensus), (2) the legal concept of an agreement combined with 3) the concept of local rule-making (several conditions of a collective agreement (contract) act as a source of labour law in the form of a local normative act). At the same time, the first two concepts outline the obligatory function, because they reflect the collective agreement (contract) in the classical private law sense, and the third one reflects the normative function of the collective agreement (contract). The author's definition of a collective agreement (contract) has been created.
References
Vavzhenchuk, S. (2011). Contract Law. KNEU [in Ukrainian].
Chanysheva, G. I. (2001). Collective relations in the field of labor: theoretical and practical problems of legal regulation [Doctoral dissertation manuscript]. Odesa National Law Academy [in Ukrainian].
Chanysheva, G. I., & Bolotina, N. B. (1999). Labor law of Ukraine. Odysseus [in Ukrainian].
Davies, P., & Freedland, M. (1983). Kahn-Freund's Labour and the Law. Stevens and Sons.
Dieterich, T. (2005). Erfurt Commentary on Labour Law. C.H. Beck [in German].
Gruzinova, L. P., & Korotkin, V. G. (2003). Labor law of Ukraine. Part 1. MAUP.
Hetmantseva, N. D. (2016, October 21). Collective agreement as a tool of social management. [Presentation at the conference]. Socio-economic and legal grounds for improving labor legislation at the current stage. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian].
Hromadka, W., & Maschmann, F. (2005). Labour Law. Vol. 1. Individual Labour Law. Springer Berlin [in German].
Hromadka, W., & Maschmann, F. (2007). Labour Law. Vol. 2. Collective Labour Law. Labour disputes. Springer Berlin [in German].
International Labour Office. (1997). World labour report 1997–1998: Industrial relations, democracy and social stability.
Kerr, С., & Staudohan, P. D. (1994). Labour Ekonomics and Industrial Relations: Markets and Institutions. Harvard University Press.
Prokopenko, V. I. (1998). Labor law of Ukraine. "Consum" company [in Ukrainian].
Pylypenko, P. D. (Ed.). (1996). Labor law of Ukraine. Free Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Taylor, S., & Emir, A. (2006). Employment Law. An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Vavzhenchuk, S. (2021). Protection and defense of labor rights of employees. Law [in Ukrainian].
Vavzhenchuk, S. (2022). Contract Law. Vol. 1. Law [in Ukrainian].
Zöllner, W., Loritz, K-G., & Hergenroder, C.W. (2008). Labour Law. Beck
[in German].
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Сергій ВАВЖЕНЧУК

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
