TRANSLATION OF LEGAL NEOLOGISMS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TERM "INSIGNIFICANT CASE"

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2021/2.117-2

Abstract

The article deals with the issue on translating legal terms from Ukrainian into English on the basis of a case study of a newly-coined term in Ukrainian legislation – 'maloznachna sprava'. The relevance of the topic of legal translation from English into Ukrainian and vice versa has become especially acute in light of the Ukraine-EU approximation agreement. While the introduction of simplified civil proceedings is itself a step towards the approximation of Ukrainian legislation to the EU, the next stage will inevitably be comparing and contrasting the existing terms within the Ukrainian and EU civil procedures. Ukrainian simplified procedure aims at considering insignificant cases (Ukr. – 'maloznachni spravy') in a speedy manner, while EU accelerated and simplified civil procedure uses the term 'small claims' for cases with a claim value for up to EUR 5,000. Obviously, these notions are not equivalent, but their meaning overlaps, creating pitfalls for translation. Thus, for proper translation, it is important to specify how the concept of small claims fits into Ukraine's national context. The notion of insignificant cases illustrates the relevance of the linguistic study of legal translations, as well as a need for the consolidation of practical achievements in the field of translation of legal discourse and, in particular, legal neologisms. The purpose of legal translation is to create a text that will be interpreted in the same way by legal professionals in the target legal system as it would be in the original legal system. The aim of translation is not to erase linguistic and cultural differences but to accommodate them, fully and unapologetically. The challenge is to convey the legal text as a fragment of a living legal system. When translating, a translator should strive for equivalence, bearing in mind the harmonisation and approximation of terminologies. The linguistic approximation of national Ukrainian legal terms to the EU terminology should be carefully considered to avoid their misinterpretation with the supranatural terms. The author emphasises the necessity to perform concept analysis between the terms in the EU and Ukraine simplified procedures and comes to the conclusion that despite having surface similarity to the EU term 'small claim', the Ukrainian term 'maloznachna sprava' is, in fact, a much wider concept. A range of translations of legal neologisms are described in the article, and the need to use a literal translation of the term is substantiated. As a result of the analysis of possible translation options and the ECtHR translation precedent, it is recommended that the term 'maloznachna sprava' should be translated as 'insignificant case' within the sphere of Ukrainian civil procedure.

References

1. Візерінгтон Д. Складнощі перекладу. Обмін інформацією між англомовним світом та Україною [Електронний ресурс] / Д. Візерінгтон // Європейська правда (2015), 11 березня 2015. – Режим доступу: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/experts/2015/03/11/7031726/.

2. Карабан В.І. Переклад англійської наукової і технічної літератури / В. І. Карабан. – Вінниця: Нова Книга, 2004. – 575 с.

3. Цивільний процесуальний кодекс України (зі змінами 2020 р.) Відомості Верховної ради України 40-41 (2004) [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text.

4. Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (2014) OJ L161/5.

5. Baklazhenko Yu.V. Ukrainian-English Translation of Legal Terms: A Case Study of Insignificant Cases and Small Claims. / Yu. Baklazhenko // Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. – 2021. – 1(9). – pp. 232–242. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-4.1-n000055.

6. Biel L. Competencies for EU Legal Translation (Presentation given at the Conference 'EU Translated: Towards Better Quality Legal Translations for Better Implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement' [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvfPGUio454&list=PLbiaVfW3NyKCmyNQKkf96oQCz1L2Yud5U&index=5 (in English).

7. Catford J.C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation / J.C. Catford. – Oxford: OUP, 1965. – 103 p.

8. Čavoški A. Interaction of law and language in the EU: Challenges of translating in multilingual environment [Електронний ресурс] / A. Čavoški // The Journal of Specialised Translation. – 2017. – No. 27. – p. 58. – Режим доступу: https://www.jostrans.org/issue27/art_cavoski.pdf.

9. Defrancq, B. Principles of EU Legal English and Terminology (Presentation given at the Conference 'EU Translated: Towards Better Quality Legal Translations for Better Implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement' [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxPpqzZBwzw&t=141s.

10. Easterbrook H. The Most Insignificant Justice: Further Evidence [Електронний ресурс] / H. Easterbook // The University of Chicago Law Review. – 1983. – No. 50. – p. 481. – Режим доступу: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234129303.pdf (in English).

11. Terminology work – Harmonization of concepts and terms: ISO 860:2007(en) [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:860:ed-3:v1:en.

12. Izarova І. О., Prytyka, Y. D. Simplified lawsuit of civil proceedings in Ukraine: the challenges of the first year of application in judicial practice / I.O. Izarova, Y.D. Prytyka // Problems of Legality. – 2019. – No. 145. – pp. 51–67. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.145.160567.

13. Jarabik B. Status of the A4U Project and the AA/DCFTA Implementation in December 201 / B. Jarabik // Reviews-Comments-Briefs A4U. – 2018. – (18) [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://eu-ua.org/sites/default/files/inline/files/a4u_reviews-comments-briefs_n18_status_of_the_a4u_project_and_the_aa-dcfta_impl._in_dec._2018_.pdf.

14. Kateryna Makarivna Moldavska v Ukraine (App No 43464/18) ECtHR, 14 May 2019 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-193900 (in English).

15. Koller W. Grundprobleme der Übersetzungstheorie. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung schwedisch-deutscher Übersetzungsfäll / W. Koller // Stockholmer germanistische Forschungen. – 1972. – No. 9. – p. 181.

16. Ladmiral J.R. La traduction comme linguistique d`invention / JR Ladmiral // W. Pockl (ed), Europaische Mehrsprachigkeit. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Mario Wandruszka. – Tubingen Niemeyer, 1981.

17. Mac Aodha M. Legal translation –an impossible task? / M. Mac Aodha // Semiotica. – 2014. – 201 (1–4). – p.207.

18. Pym A. Exploring Translation Theories / A. Pym. – Routledge, 2010.

19. Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R2421&from=EN (in English).

20. Reiss K., Vermeer H.J. Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained / Reiss K., Vermeer H.J. – Routledge, 2014.

21. Stern L. Book review of Translation Issues in Language and Law by F. Olsen, A. Lorz D. Stein (eds) / L. Stern // The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law. – 2009. – 17 (1). – p. 161.

22. Wolff L. Legal Translation / L. Wolf // The Oxford Handbook of Translation. – Oxford: OUP, 2011. – 228-242.

Published

30.06.2021

How to Cite

TRANSLATION OF LEGAL NEOLOGISMS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TERM "INSIGNIFICANT CASE". (2021). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 117(2), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2021/2.117-2