SMART CONTRACT OF CRYPTOASSETS IN THE CIVIL LAW OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2024/1.127-7

Keywords:

Smart contracts , crypto assets, Decentralized database , computer code

Abstract

Background. The article covers the analysis of the smart contract of cryptoassets in the civil law of Ukraine. Attention is argued that the essence of a smart contract of cryptoassets is that it is a self-executing contract, that is represented and executed by a computer program, the terms of which are included in the internal functions of a decentralized database that is not under the control of the databases of the parties to the contract or third parties . It is noted that a smart contract of cryptoassets, like any contract, can be declared invalid if the will to conclude it does not meet the conditions of validity of this transaction, regardless of the form in which this transaction is concluded, as in this case in the form of computer code. It is also stated that the terms of the smart contract of cryptoassets must be specific (clear, unambiguous), feasible (objective), valid, capable of automation (evaluative terms such as "reasonable term" cannot be used); it must exist within the blockchain platform (on which crypto-asset transactions are currently carried out) and not provide for the receipt and confirmation of information from the outside (in this regard, the terms of force majeure are not specified in the smart contract).

Methods. The research uses dialectical, comparative-legal, formal-logical and other methods of scientific knowledge.

Results. It is proved that a smart contract is an agreement represented and executed by a computer program containing all its terms and conditions, which are stored in an electronic registry system, where the result of this program execution is recorded.

Conclusions. The determination of the person on whom legal liability is imposed when a smart contract does not perform the programmed function depends on the terms of the smart contract, and in their absence, the provisions of applicable law regarding the legal consequences of non-performance of the contract and liability for such non-performance should be used.

 

References

Baranov, O. A. (2017). The Internet of Things (IoT): Legal issues in the application of smart contracts. Information and Law, (4), 26–40 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2017.4(23).273096

Boiko, N. (2018, April 12). Smart contracts – are they really contracts and are they really "smart". Ukrainian National Bar Association [in Ukrainian]. https://unba.org.ua/publications/3169-smart-kontrakti--chi-spravdi-dogovori-ta-chi-dijsno-rozumni.html

Chornyi, O. M. (2018). Cryptographic protocols of electronic cash based on blockchain technology [master's thesis]. National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" [in Ukrainian]. https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/23503

Civil code of Ukraine. (2003). Law of Ukraine dated 16.01.2003. No 435-IV. Official Gazette of Ukraine, 11, 461 [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/435-15/ed20030116

Clack, C., Bakshi, V., & Braine, L. (2016, revised March 2017). Smart Contract Templates: foundations, design landscape and research directions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305779577_Smart_Contract_Templates_foundations_design_landscape_and_research_directions_CDClack_VABakshi_and_LBraine_arxiv160800771_2016 ISDA, & Linklaters. (2017, August 3).

Whitepaper: Smart contracts and distributed ledger – a legal perspective. International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA). https://www.isda.org/2017/08/03/smart-contracts-and-distributed-ledger-a-legal-perspective/

Ivanov, A. M., & Shmyha, V. O. (2022). Smart contracts in contractual relations: Realities and prospects of use. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 4, 150–152 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-4/32

Mamchur, L., & Nedybalyuk, O. (2018). Civil-law realities of permissibility of using a smart-contract in contractual relations. History and Law Journal, 2, 90–94[in Ukrainian]. https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16037

Navhorodskyi, A. (2020, November 25). Smart contract: How to regulate blockchain technology in Ukraine? My Right [in Ukrainian]. https://moe-pravo.com.ua/publications/smart-kontrakt-yak-vregulyuvaty-tehnologiyu-blokchejn-v-ukrayini/

Nekit, K. H. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of smart-contracts as the basis for the emergence of ownership. Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute": Political Science. Sociology. Law, 3, 101–105 [in Ukrainian]. http://visnyk-psp.kpi.ua/article/ view/229494/228501

On electronic commerce. (2015). Law of Ukraine dated 03.09.2015. No 675-VIII. Official Gazette of Ukraine, 78, 2590 [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/675-19#Text

On the circulation of cryptocurrency in Ukraine. (2017). Draft Law of Ukraine dated 06.10.2017. No 7183 [in Ukrainian]. http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/ pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=62684

Stark, J. (2016). Making sense of blockchain smart contracts. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2016/06/04/making-sense-of-blockchain-smart-contracts/

Veres, I. (2020). Legal nature of the smart contract. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 9, 15–18 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.9.03

Zadobriuk, D. (2022, November 20). What are smart contracts and what are the principles of their operation? The Legal Bulletin of Ukraine. https://yvu.com.ua/shho-take-smart-kontrakty-i-yaki-pryntsypy-yih-roboty/

Additional Files

Published

07.11.2024

Issue

Section

Types of publication

How to Cite

SMART CONTRACT OF CRYPTOASSETS IN THE CIVIL LAW OF UKRAINE. (2024). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 127(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2024/1.127-7

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.