NON-JUDICIAL FORMS OF PROTECTION OF INFORMATION RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALSAND THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF THEIR ADAPTATION TO THE STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2021/4.119-7

Keywords:

European Union, information rights, alternative dispute resolution mechanism, the supervisory authority in the field of access to public information and protection of personal data, non-judicial protection of information rights, private person, complaint on violation of information rights.

Abstract

The article examines the methods and procedures for the protection of the information rights of individuals by the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, and by the executive and local authorities; identifies prospects for expanding alternative information disputes resolution involving citizens and legal entities based on the implementation of the European Union standards in the scope of legal regulation.

The aim of this article is to conduct research about the features of non-judicial forms of protection of information rights of individuals, to identify the prospects of introducing an independent supervisory authority in Ukraine in the field of access to public information and personal data protection as the main institutions of pre-trial settlement of information disputes. 

During the preparation of the article, general scientific methods of cognition were used: dialectical, system-structural, formal-logical, as well as special methods, inter alia, historical, comparative-legal, sociological.

At the present time, in Ukraine, this is proven that the main form of non-judicial protection of information rights of individuals is to lodge a complaint about the violation of the relevant category of rights to the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights. At the same time, the reasons for the low efficiency of the implementation of such form of protection of information rights as filing a complaint to the head of the entity or the entity in the activities of which the violation was committed or to a higher authority or an official. The necessity of establishing an independent supervisory authority in Ukraine in the field of ensuring access to public information and protection of personal data is substantiated, taking into account the experience of the European Union member states as the main institution of pre-trial settlement of information disputes. The main world models of these bodies are described, their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed in view of the prospects of improving the mechanism of alternative resolution of information disputes related to the protection of information rights of individuals.

The conclusions set out the main provisions of the research, formulate further directions of research on the implementation of non-judicial forms of protection of information rights of individuals, outline vectors of implementation of the European Union's experience in establishing national supervisory authorities in this scope.

References

1. Venger V., Zaiarnyi O. Pravovyj analiz osnovnyh modelej

instytualizaciyi derzhavnogo kontrolyu u sferi personalnyh danyh ta dostupu

do publichnoyi informaciyi v Ukrainy. Kyiv. 2020 r., 30 s. [Legal analysis of

the main models of institutionalization of state control in the field of personal

data and access to public information in Ukraine]. URL: https://rm.coe.int/

legal-analysis-data-ua/16809ee077 (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021).

2. Konvenciya pro zahyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnyh svobod vid

04.11.1950 r. [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and

Fundamental Freedoms] URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/

995_004. (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021).

3. Ugoda pro asociaciyu mizh Ukrayinoyu, z odniyeyi storony, ta

Yevropejskym Soyuzom, Yevropejskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoyi

energiyi i yihnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoyi storony vid 27.06.2014 r.

URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011 (data zvernennya:

21.10.2021).

4. Konstytuciya Ukrayiny vid 28.06.1996 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/

laws/show/254k/96-vr. (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021).

5. Bernazyuk, I. M. (2020). Instytualizaciya derzhavnogo kontrolyu za

doderzhannyam zakonodavstva Ukrayiny pro zahyst personalnyh danyh.

Visnyk Luganskogo derzhavnogo universytetu vnutrishnih sprav imeni

E.O. Didorenka, 3(91), 15-27 [Institutionalization of state control over

compliance with the legislation of Ukraine on personal data protection].

https://doi.org/10.33766/2524-0323.91.15-27.

6. Mytko A., Kolcova I. Informatsiina bezpeka v konteksti vvedennya

instytutu informacijnogo komisara (ombudsmena) v Ukrainy. Mediaforum:

analityka, prognozy, Mediarorum: Analytics, Forecasts, informacijnyj

menedzhment: Information Management: zb. nauk. prac. Chernivci:

Collection of Research Articles. Chernivtsi: Cherniveckyj nac. un-t, 2018.

Chernivtsi National University, 2018. Tom 6. C. 112-122 [6. Information

security in the context of the introduction of the institution of information

commissioner (ombudsman) in Ukraine].

7. Kushnir I. V. Konstytucijne pravo osoby na dostup do publichnoyi

informaciyi ta jogo zabezpechennya Upovnovazhenym Verhovnoi Rady

Ukrayiny z prav lyudyny : dys. kand. yuryd nauk. 12.00.02. Nac. Akad. vnutr.

Sprav. Kyyiv, 2018. 246 s [Constitutional right of a person to access to

public information and its provision by the Commissioner of the Verkhovna

Rada of Ukraine for Human Rights].

8. Mendel T. Analitychnyj oglyad modelej naglyadovyh organiv u sferi

dostupu do informatsii [Analytical review of models of supervisory bodies in

the field of access to information]. URL:http://comin.kmu.gov.ua/control/

uk/publish/article?art_id=115100&cat_id=108852 (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021).

9. Miyatovych D. Dopovid Komisara Rady Yevropy z prav lyudyny:

"Zahyst prav lyudyny v epohu shtuchnogo intelektu". Strasburg (Franciya)

03 lypnya 2018 r. [Report of the Council of Europe Commissioner for

Human Rights: "Protection of human rights in the era of artificial

intelligence"] URL: https://www.coe.int/ru/web/commissioner/-/safeguarding-

human-rights-in-the-era-of-artificial-intelligence#main-content. (data zvernennya:

10.04.2021).

10. Nesterenko O. Informacijnyj ombudsmen v mehanizmi

zabezpechennya prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnyh svobod. [Information

Ombudsman in the mechanism of human rights and fundamental freedoms]

URL: http://uapp.org/pub_analitics/5111.html (data zvernennya – 01.04.2021).

11. Pirch Musar N., Shynkunyene D. Pravovyj vysnovok do proektu

Zakonu Ukrayiny "Pro zahyst personalnyh danyh", yakyj mistyt

rekomendaciyi shodo uzgodzhennya cogo dokumenta zi standartamy Rady

Yevropy ta YeS. [Legal opinion on the draft Law of Ukraine "Pro zahyst

personalnyh danyh", which contains recommendations for harmonization

of this document with the standards of the Council of Europe and the EU]

2020. 64 s.

12. Matuzov N. Y. Pravovaya systema y lychnost [Legal system and

personality]. – Saratov: Yzd-vo Saratov. un–ta, 1987. 216 s.

13. Rekomendaciyi do Poryadku zdijsnennya Upovnovazhenym

kontrolyu za doderzhannyam zakonodavstva pro zahyst personalnyh danyh:

Nakaz Upovnovazhenogo Verhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny z prav lyudyny vid

08.01.2014 roku. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0002715-

14/print (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021 roku).

14. Pro zvernennya gromadyan: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 02.10.1996 roku

№ 393/96-vr. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/393/96-%D0%B2%

D1%80/print (data zvernennya: 21.10.2021 roku).

15. Tsyvіlniy kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vіd 16.01.2003 r. № 435-IV.

URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15. (data zvernennia:

26.08.2020).

16. Kodeks admіnіstratyvnogo sudochynstva Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy

vіd 06.07.2005 roku. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-

15/conv#n9560 (data zvernennia: 21.10.2021 roku).

17. Pro dostup do publichnoi informacii: Zakon Ukrainy vіd 13.01.2011 r.

№ 2939-VI URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2939-17. (data

zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

18. Pro zahyst personalnyh danyh: Zakon Ukrainy vіd 01.06.2010 r.

№ 2297-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17. (data

zvernennia: 01.09.2021).

19. Mendel T. Analіtychniy oglyad modeley naglyadovyh organіv u sferі

dostupu do іnformatsіi. URL: http://comin.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/

article?art_id=115100&cat_id=108852 (data zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

20. Konventsіya pro zahyst fіzychnyh osіb u zv'yazku z

avtomatyzovanoyu obrobkoyu personalnyh danyh vіd 28.01.1981 r. № 108.

URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_326. (data zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

21. Convention 108: Convention for the protection of individuals with

regard to the processing of personal data. Decision of the Committee of

Ministers – 128th session of the Committee of Ministers, Elsinore, 18 May

2018. Council of Europe, June 2018. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/

meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/LIBE/DV/2018/09-10/Convention_

108_EN.pdf (дата звернення – 01.04.2021).

22. Posіbnyk z Yevropejskogo prava u sferі zahystu personalnyh

danyh. K.: K.І.S., 2020. 436 s. URL: https://rm.coe.int/data-protection-

handbook-ukr-2020-block-web/1680a1f65e (data zvernennia – 21.10.2021).

23. Reglament Yevropejskogo Parlamentu і Rady (YeS) 2016/679 vіd

27 kvіtnya 2016 roku pro zahyst fіzychnyh osіb u zv'yazku z

opratsyuvannyam personalnyh danyh і pro vіlniy ruh takyh danyh, ta pro

skasuvannia Dyrektyvy 95/46/ЄS (Zagalniy reglament pro zahyst danyh).

URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679.

(data zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

24. Pro dostup do іnformatsіi, shcho perebuvae u volodіnnі derzhavnyh

organіv: Rekomendatsіi Rady Yevropy vіd 25.11.1981 roku № R (81) 19.

URL: https://cedem.org.ua/library/rekomendatsiya-r-81-19-pro-dostup-do-

informatsiyi-shho-znahodytsya-u-rozporyadzhenni-derzhavnyh-organiv/. (data

zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

25. Pro dostup do ofіtsіynyh dokumentіv: rekomendatsіi Rady Yevropy:

vіd 21.02.2002 r. № R (2002)2. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/

show/994_a33. (data zvernennia: 21.10.2021).

26. Zaiarnyi O. A. Pravove zabezpechennya rozvytku іnformatsіynoi

sfery Ukrainy: admіnіstratyvno-delіktniy aspekt : monohrafiia. Herson:

Vydavnychiy dіm "Gelvetyka", 2017. 700 s. URL: http://ippi.org.ua/sites/

default/files/zayarnii_monografiya_tv_pereplet_0.pdf (data zvernennia

21.10.2021).

27. Zaiarnyi O.A. Do pytannya shchodo vykonannya Ukrayinoyu

mizhnarodnyh zobov'yazan shchodo zaprovadzhennia institutu

informaciinogo ombudsmana: deyaki konceptualno-prykladni aspekty.

Naukovyj visnyk Uzhgorodskogo Natsionalnogo Universytetu. Seriya: Pravo.

Vypusk 64. 2021. S. 213 – 219. URL: http://visnyk-pravo.uzhnu.edu.ua/

article/download/238497/237113 (data zvernennia: 21.10.2021 roku).

28. Pro Natsіonalnu komіsіyu z pytan zahystu personalnyh danyh ta

dostupu do publіchnoi іnformatsіі: proekt Zakonu Ukraіny vіd 11.10.2021 roku

№ reyestr 6177. URL: Ofіtsіyniy portal Verhhovnoi Rady Ukraіny (data

zvernennia: 21.10.2021 roku).

Published

21.10.2021

How to Cite

NON-JUDICIAL FORMS OF PROTECTION OF INFORMATION RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALSAND THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF THEIR ADAPTATION TO THE STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2021). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 119(4), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2021/4.119-7

Most read articles by the same author(s)